Posted tagged ‘Guantanamo’

Free at last, praise Allah!

June 21, 2009

Four Uighurs experienced their first swim in the ocean recently after being released from seemingly endless detention at Guantanamo.  Their new home is the island of Bermuda, which at first glance appears to be an unlikely destination for men who grew up in a landlocked part of China. (more…)

The wheels of justice grind exceeding slow

May 25, 2009

Lakhdar Boumediene’s odyssey began back in 2001 when he was picked up in Bosnia, suspected in a bomb plot against the U.S. Embassy in Sarajevo. In January 2002 he  arrived at Gitmo, where he languished for more than six years without charges ever being filed and without hope of  release.

Then in June 2008 the U. S. Supreme Court ruled  that the  Algerian-born Muslim was entitled to the basic right of habeas corpus.

At last there was hope that he would be able to leave the prison located on the Guantanamo Bay naval base.

Still he had to wait … and wait … and wait. (more…)

Parallels between UK and US big-brotherism

June 15, 2008

As we celebrate the 793rd anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta today there are two news items that relate to to habeas corpus, the basic guarantee against arbitrary unlawful imprisonment– one in the UK and the other in the US.

In the UK we see Tory MP David Davis resigning over the Counter-Terrorism Bill that Labor PM Brown rammed through Parliament. This law allows detention for up to 42 days (six weeks) of British citizens without charges being brought and without any habeas corpus hearing being required. Davis noted that this is just the latest step in what he calls the “Big Brother” state and that it went a step too far infringing on the historical freedoms of British citizens. These liberties, he pointed out, can be traced back almost eight hundred years to the Magna Carta, which guaranteed the right of habeas corpus.

What most Americans don’t realize is that David Davis was not just an ordinary backbencher but the Shadow Home Secretary and in a new Tory government would be charged with enforcing the Counter-Terrorism Bill. With the latest polls showing a likely Tory victory at the next electoral opportunity, Davis was faced not only with a law with which he profoundly disagreed but also the looming task of administering that law as the government Minister in charge. (more…)

Damn the Constitution! Full speed ahead!

June 14, 2008

Anyone who thought that a mere decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Boumediene v Bush would deter the Bush administration from pursuing its kangaroo court proceedings in Guantanamo was quickly disabused of this notion. Within hours the White House had issued statements that Bush “would comply” with the ruling but “strongly disagreed” with it and would consider whether to “respond to the court ruling with new legislation.”

This is bizarre. Bush seems to lack a basic understanding of the role of the Executive under the U.S. Constitution. The President’s job is to enforce the laws that the Congress passes. The SCOTUS has the final word on whether a law is unconstitutional. It is emphatically not the job of the President to either overrule the Supreme Court or pass legislation. In addition, the President doesn’t have the right to pick the minority opinion just because he prefers it — under the U.S. Constitution he is bound to implement the ruling of the majority of the court.

Or as Blue Texan puts in succinctly at Firedoglake in a piece entitled “Bush doesn’t know what the Supreme Court does:”

I know Bush obviously doesn’t give a shit about the law, and he views the Court — the institution that awarded him the Presidency made him King — as a rubber stamp. But it’s pretty disturbing to hear someone who swore an oath to defend the Constitution continually demonstrate his total ignorance of it.


June 15 is Magna Carta Day

June 14, 2008

Happy birthday, Magna Carta!

On Sunday June 15, the Magna Carta will be 793 years old. This great historical document was signed by English King John on the field of Runnymede in 1215 under pressure from rebellious barons. The rights enshrined in the Magna Carta have been the most significant early influence on the extensive historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today.

One of these constitutional protections which has its roots in the Magna Carta is the right to habeas corpus.

Habeas corpus was so important to the Founding Fathers that it was incorporated into the body of Article 1 of the Constitution itself, prior to addition of the Bill of Rights. The Founders did so because they understood that habeas corpus was essential to liberty and that liberty was the core value of the new nation. This consensus of the Founding Fathers of the necessity of having recourse to a writ of habeas corpus was based on their experience in dealing with an out-of-control monarch in the person of George III. (more…)

The APA reiterates their swiss cheese prohibition on torture

November 6, 2007

In August the American Psychological Association adopted an official position that allowed professional psychologists to work at detention facilities like Guantanamo — but not participate in torture. The policy was rife with swiss cheese loopholes. As a result there were protests from psychologists across the country that the APA should have the same absolute prohibitions on participation in torture that American medical doctors and psychoanalysts have. [See earlier posts on the resolution passed by the faculty at Earlham college]

But now, the APA confronts this situation by simply sending a letter to President Bush that says they really, really, really are opposed to torture (insert metaphorical foot stomp here) — and refers in circular fashion to their earlier swiss cheese statement prohibiting torture as if anything had really changed.

Furthermore the letter from APA President Sharon Stephens Brehm contains a troubling offer

to work with your Administration and the Congress to develop policies on interrogation that provide ethical and effective means to elicit information to prevent acts of violence.

Sounds like swiss cheese still. A loophole that would allow APA members even more opportunities to be co-opted into participation in torture — purely for research, of course. Lest we forget, there were those who used that excuse in Hitler’s Germany — and Stalin’s Russia — and perhaps today’s CIA.

An extended discussion of this matter and a copy of the entire letter from Sharon Brehm can be found at

Psych prof calls for change in APA stance on interrogation

October 21, 2007

Pyschologists should not be co-opted into participating in torture. Psychological research indicates that individuals do not ordinarily become whistleblowers, but instead tend to act like sheep. Why is the American Psychological Association allowing its members to work at detention sites? Other professional associations like the AMA and the psychoanalyst group will not permit their members to be placed in this situation.

EC Psych Profs Call for APA to
Change Stance on Interrogation

Oct. 4, 2007

Michael R. Jackson

Michael R. Jackson, associate professor of psychology at Earlham, invites colleagues from across the nation to join his department’s faculty and sign the Resolution Regarding Participation by Psychologists in Interrogations in Military Detention Centers.

RICHMOND, Ind. — The psychology department at Earlham College has passed a resolution calling for a change in the interrogations policy of the American Psychological Association (APA). Breaking new ground by taking this national leadership role, the Resolution Regarding Participation by Psychologists
in Interrogations in Military Detention Centers
is the first of its kind issued by an American college or university academic unit. (more…)